The Transformation of Tibetan Identity

Location

Jereld R. Nicholson Library

Subject Area

Sociology

Description

After the Chinese invasion of Tibet in 1951, Tibetan identity began to secularize, shifting from a more traditional religious to a more explicitly political identity. The few studies that focus on the secularization of Tibetan identity, even if only secondarily, claim that it is either a compulsory product imposed by the reinforcement of modernization by the Chinese authority or a voluntary product through younger generation of Tibetans’ internalization, primarily through schooling, of the Chinese colonization ideology. Either way, those scholars of Tibetan studies treat the secularization of Tibetan identity as a form of cultural assimilation or deterioration of Tibetan identity. Based on in-depth ethnographic fieldwork in a Tibetan village, as well as my own Tibetan ancestry, I argue that despite its secular nature, current Tibetan identity is better understood as a form of resistance to both direct and indirect Chinese domination than as a result of cultural assimilation and identity deterioration.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

Import Event to Google Calendar

COinS
 
May 15th, 12:15 PM May 15th, 1:30 PM

The Transformation of Tibetan Identity

Jereld R. Nicholson Library

After the Chinese invasion of Tibet in 1951, Tibetan identity began to secularize, shifting from a more traditional religious to a more explicitly political identity. The few studies that focus on the secularization of Tibetan identity, even if only secondarily, claim that it is either a compulsory product imposed by the reinforcement of modernization by the Chinese authority or a voluntary product through younger generation of Tibetans’ internalization, primarily through schooling, of the Chinese colonization ideology. Either way, those scholars of Tibetan studies treat the secularization of Tibetan identity as a form of cultural assimilation or deterioration of Tibetan identity. Based on in-depth ethnographic fieldwork in a Tibetan village, as well as my own Tibetan ancestry, I argue that despite its secular nature, current Tibetan identity is better understood as a form of resistance to both direct and indirect Chinese domination than as a result of cultural assimilation and identity deterioration.