Faculty Publications
Title
Factor Structure of the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire and Its Relationship to Athlete Variables
Publication Date
2003
Disciplines
Sports Sciences
Abstract
Little research exists to identify optimal coaching behaviors and factors that influence the effectiveness of particular behaviors. The present study tested 484 athletes in order to determine sub-scales on the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ). The CBQ measures athletes’ perceptions of coaching behaviors and evaluates their effectiveness in helping athletes play better and maintain optimal mental states and focus. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model (negative activation, supportiveness/emotional composure) derived from an exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Correlational analyses indicated that athletes with higher anxiety and lower self-confidence and compatibility with the coach were more likely to negatively evaluate coaching behaviors. The results support and expand on Smoll and Smith’s (1989) model of leadership behaviors in sport.
Document Type
Published Version
Original Citation
Jean M. Williams, Gerald J. Jerome, Laura J. Kenow, Tracie Rogers, Tessa A. Sartain, & Greg Darland
Factor structure of the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire and its relationship to athlete variables.
Sport Psychologist, 2003, volume 17, issue 1, pages 16-34
http://journals.humankinetics.com/AcuCustom/SiteName/Documents/DocumentItem/2774.pdf
DigitalCommons@Linfield Citation
Williams, Jean M.; Jerome, Gerald J.; Kenow, Laura J.; Rogers, Tracie; Sartain, Tessa A.; and Darland, Greg, "Factor Structure of the Coaching Behavior Questionnaire and Its Relationship to Athlete Variables" (2003). Faculty Publications. Published Version. Submission 3.
https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/hhpafac_pubs/3
Comments
This article is the publisher-created version, also considered to be the final version or the version of record. It includes value-added elements provided by the publisher, such as copy editing, layout changes, and branding consistent with the rest of the publication.