Faculty Sponsor(s)
Dr. Rachel Schley
Subject Area
History
Description
Leni Riefenstahl, an acclaimed female director during Nazi-era Germany, remains one of the most polarizing figures in film history, simultaneously celebrated for her technical innovations and condemned for her complicity in Nazi propaganda. While historians have typically examined Riefenstahl in regard to either her gender or her work for the Nazi regime, this study offers a more holistic approach to her. This paper examines how American audiences perceived Riefenstahl and her work from 1933 to 1945, analyzing the ways in which gender and power shape evaluations of one’s life and career. Drawing on primary sources such as Library of Congress archived newspaper articles, New York Times articles, documentaries, and Riefenstahl’s own memoir, this study argues that her reception is shaped by the tension between her technical innovations, her association with Nazi propaganda, and her gender, reflecting broader cultural and historical debates from that time about complicity, memory, and the relationship between art and politics. Drawing on Joan Scott’s framework, this research highlights how Riefenstahl’s position as a woman in a traditional, patriarchal society both informed and complicated polarized reactions in the American press—reactions shaped by anti-fascist sentiment, art and politics relationship, and Hollywood’s influence on public memory.
Recommended Citation
Arnold, Elizabeth, "A Dark Light: Leni Riefenstahl as a Case Study in Historical Memory" (2025). Linfield University Student Symposium: A Celebration of Scholarship and Creative Achievement. Event. Submission 10.
https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/symposium/2025/all/10
A Dark Light: Leni Riefenstahl as a Case Study in Historical Memory
Leni Riefenstahl, an acclaimed female director during Nazi-era Germany, remains one of the most polarizing figures in film history, simultaneously celebrated for her technical innovations and condemned for her complicity in Nazi propaganda. While historians have typically examined Riefenstahl in regard to either her gender or her work for the Nazi regime, this study offers a more holistic approach to her. This paper examines how American audiences perceived Riefenstahl and her work from 1933 to 1945, analyzing the ways in which gender and power shape evaluations of one’s life and career. Drawing on primary sources such as Library of Congress archived newspaper articles, New York Times articles, documentaries, and Riefenstahl’s own memoir, this study argues that her reception is shaped by the tension between her technical innovations, her association with Nazi propaganda, and her gender, reflecting broader cultural and historical debates from that time about complicity, memory, and the relationship between art and politics. Drawing on Joan Scott’s framework, this research highlights how Riefenstahl’s position as a woman in a traditional, patriarchal society both informed and complicated polarized reactions in the American press—reactions shaped by anti-fascist sentiment, art and politics relationship, and Hollywood’s influence on public memory.
